The
Power of Privilege by Joseph Soares, 2007, Excerpts
In 1968, research conducted by Harvard
estimated there were approximately sixty-nine select colleges in the land.
Yale’s Office of Institutional Research [OIR] circulated a confidential report
on each of the sixty-nine colleges ranked by entering SAT scores. Institutions
were rated “A” to “F” with fifty points separating each letter on the scale.
Neither Harvard nor Yale was in the “A” group.
A: Cal Tech, Carnegie-Melon, MIT, Stanford,
Swarthmore, UC Berkeley, UCLA, UCSD. Most of the “A” list were in California , not New England .
B: Amherst, Harvard, and Yale.
C: Brandeis, Bryan Maw, Harvey Mudd, New
College, Pomona ,
Reed, and Wesleyan.
D: Barnard, Brown, Cornell, Haverford,
Middlebury, University of Pennsylvania, Princeton, St. John’s in Maryland,
Trinity in Connecticut, and Williams.
E & F: The rest of the sixty-nine,
including the two remaining Ivy League members, Colombia
University and Dartmouth .
These four state universities - UC Berkeley,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, University of Michigan at Ann
Arbor, and the University of Wisconsin at Madison – have the most “super
students” in the entire United States because unlike the Ivies they do
admissions at the top end of the ability pool based on academic, not personal,
qualities.
Elite public institutions tend to draw from a
broader social stratum than private ones do. Being dependent on the public
purse, rather than on affluent families’ personal savings, public elite
universities can truly admit students without any regard to ability to pay. They
tend to be more middle class, and have a larger representation from the working
class that America ’s
private elite colleges. Public elite universities also have a different sense
of mission than private ones do. Being upper class, and more dependent on the
taxpayer’s favor, public elite universities tend to focus less on old
traditional humanities subjects, and more on modern natural science and
technology.
No comments:
Post a Comment